Heather and Peter at Otterborne

Remembrance Day is a day we rightly remember those who have died in war.

Heather and Peter attended the Remembrance Day Service in Otterborne, Hampshire. Heather’s friend Mary is a Parish Councillor there and her husband, Jim, was one if the four men who cleaned the war memorial. She found the service a moving experience.

Richard attended the Remembrance Day service in Redhill as the band he plays trumpet with, the New London Concert Band, was playing the music and they were short of trumpets. With so many services on Remembrance Day almost every amateur band in south London is pressed into service somewhere and trumpet players are in demand. The music they played included Elgar’s Nimrod and a piece composed in 1919 by Kenneth Alford to commemerate those who died in the war, “The Vanished Army”.

At the meeting of Sutton Council on 4 November Richard seconded a motion noting how well Sutton is surviving the recession. And Heather, speaking in the same debate, drew attention to particular successes in our own Ward.

The motion noted that Sutton is in the top three London Boroughs for the percentage of the adult population in work, at 81%, that it has lower unemployment than the average in London, that there has been record business growth in the last year and an increasing rate of business start ups.

Richard drew attention to the programme spearheaded by the Housing, Economy and Business Committee to match the skills of the local workforce to the growing sectors in the local economy. The full text of his speech is on his blog, on this website (see “Richard’s Blog”). Here is the text of Heather’s speech.

What Heather said to Council about jobs in Sutton 4th November 2013

“As someone who spent nearly twenty five years working for British companies, I am pleased to speak in favour of this motion.

That experience is why I have strongly supported Subsea 7”s vote of confidence in Sutton and its wish to expand here.  I regard this as a litmus test for business support in this Borough. Because the company is growing and winning contracts overseas.  This is what we need. It plans to create nearly 500 new jobs in Sutton, and not just in engineering.  This was described by a Conservative as “just a few” earlier in this debate.

Those jobs are vital in the current economic climate and should not be dismissed. Those extra jobs will lead to more business for local shops, cafes and restaurants.  Surprisingly the Leader of the Opposition found this difficult to understand at a recent Strategy and Resources Committee.

Subsea 7 wants to encourage people in Sutton to understand the opportunities in engineering. For the last few years the company has been going into local schools and  talking to young people  about careers in engineering, and it plans to expand this, for example by inviting GCSE and A Level students into their offices to get “up close and personal “ and see the excitement that there is in engineering.

We need engineers if British manufacturing is to compete internationally. The company’s new investment will also lead to over £500,000 in community developments through section 106 funding.  In my book that means more jobs.

The company must therefore have been surprised to find that the immediate reaction from the local Conservatives was to oppose its plans to expand.  As we heard tonight, they continue to do so.

No wonder William Hague had to pay a flying visit down here!

I am delighted to be a member of the local party that has been so successful at the ballot box that it can offer practical measures to support business rather than the hot airwe get from the Opposition.”

The storm of 27/28 October had an effect locally but not as bad as feared. A fallen tree blocked Devonshire Avenue for a time but was quickly cleared by Council contractors.

Some other trees have been damaged, including one in Cavendish Road.

Given the high winds and heavy rains forecast, we had contacted Sutton Council’s Tree Team.  The trees are all in leaf, which made the branches heavier and created a greater wind resistance.  This means we were much more likely to see trees falling down.

They told us “We are on 24 hour call out this weekend and we have our Tree Contractors on standby”

Priority is always given to keeping the main roads open, then other roads followed by parkland.

Sutton station had no trains during the morning, but services soon returned to normal.

We are glad the weather was not as bad as they say it could have been, and that the Council responded well.

The damaged tree in Cavendish Road

The side entrance

“Stakeholder” meetings to discuss the Sutton Gateway project are now underway, with local organisations, including the Highfields’ Residents Association and the South Sutton Neighbourhood Association. This stage will be followed by wider public consultation including an exhibition.

The project is designed to improve the “Gateway to Sutton” from the south, along the Brighton Road and around Sutton station. The main elements, subject to consultation, include:

– opening the side entrance to the station

– re-development of the Cedar Road / Brighton Road junction to include a “countdown” crossing to tell pedestrians how long they have to cross

– further development of the facilities for cyclists  

– re-design of the steep steps up to the side entrance so they are at an acceptable angle

– better landscaping, street furniture and paving around this area, the station entrance area and the area around Sutherland House. The redundant cycle path outside Sutherland House will be removed to make more room for landscaping.

 The station manager has confirmed that the side entrance would be manned from 7am to 7pm and at other times open but monitored on screens at the front entrance.

Since they were elected Richard and Heather have campaigned for the opening of the side entrance to Sutton station. We are now reasonably certain that this ambition will be realised by next February.

Week in and week out, Heather and Richard deal with a mass of casework on behalf of residents of the Ward.

The story connected to the “dropped kerb”, seen above, is an interesting example.

An inspection of the Borough’s waste clearing services conducted by the Health and Safety Executive last year led to the HSE identifying certain improvements in working practices that they wanted the Council to adopt. This included not requiring workers to have to manipulate heavy metal bins that were damaged and would not roll on their wheels, and not bumping the heavy bins up and down kerbs. At Redruth House, in Grange Road, this created a problem as one of the bin stores, built when the block was constructed in 1969, faces onto the pavement in Camborne Road. It was only possible for the binmen to empty the large metal bins if they could be bumped across the pavement and down the kerb into the road, to the cart. The rough treatment had damaged the bins.

Approached by the Residents’ Association, Richard’s solution was to work with Council officers to get the bins repaired and a “dropped kerb” put in so the bins can be rolled into the road. A white line deters car users from blocking the dropped kerb by parking there.

The Association (the Redruth House Sutton Residents Co. Ltd.), which is in effect a committee of residents who act as “managing agents” for the block, invited Richard to their Annual General Meeting on 24 October, where he was warmly thanked. Richard said he endorsed the view of the chair of the Company, in his annual report that:

“Redruth House enjoys the reputation of being one of the best managed blocks in Sutton.”

He thought this was, in part, because the blocks are managed by a committee of residents and not a remote and disinterested managing agent company.

39A during demolition of the detached house that stood on the site

Richard and Heather have submitted their comments on the appeal to the Planning Inspectorate by the developers of 39A Eaton Road. The appeal seeks to overturn the decision of Sutton Council to reject the latest planning application for the property, and seeks an award of costs against the Council. We oppose the appeal.

Our comments are as below. The history of this development is described in our comments. Designs for a block of four small flats were twice rejected by the Council, Richard speaking to the Development Control Committee on the successive applications, but the developer has still built something without planning permission and asked the remote Planning Inspectorate, based in Bristol, to overturn democratic local decisions. We invite residents to use any of this material in framing their own objections.

Submissions should be marked “For the attention of Peter Lyne, The Planning Inspectorate.” Quote the reference

APPEAL. APP/P5870/A/13/7205143. 39A EATON  ROAD, SUTTON, SURREY. SM2 5EA

The email address is teamp2@pins.gsi.gov.uk

Postal address: Peter Lyne, The Planning Inspectorate

3/10 Wing, TempleQuay House

2 The Square, Bristol, BS1 6PN

“Submission by Councillors Richard Clifton and Heather Honour, Liberal Democrat Councillors for Sutton South Ward, London Borough of Sutton.

APPEAL. APP/P5870/A/13/7205143.

39A EATON  ROAD, SUTTON, SURREY. SM2 5EA

We are Councillors for Sutton South Ward in the London Borough of Sutton, where this property is situated. We ask you to consider the following concerning this appeal.

The process followed by the developer has aroused much local disquiet. It is a tale of three designs. The first design was rejected by Sutton Council but passed by the Planning Inspectorate on appeal. There was then a change of ownership of the property and a second design was proposed. This was also turned down by Sutton Council. The developer could at that point have appealed to the Planning Inspectorate but chose not to do so. Instead he demolished the house and built something different from what he had permission for, the third design.

Regardless of what the Inspectorate now decides on the substance of the case, there would be no justice in any award of costs to the developer, as he has ignored planning law in building something for which he does not have permission, perhaps hoping no-one would notice. Nor would it be right not to ask the developer to mitigate some of the negative effects of the structure built without permission.

The structure as built departs from the design for which permission was obtained in a number of ways that we find objectionable. In particular, the overall height is greater and the design of the windows at the front is different. The comment was made by a Councillor at the Development Control Committee discussion that the approved design made it look like a house but the design built made it look more like a block of flats. It is a far less attractive design. 

There is an oddness about the boundary wall with 6 ConistonGardens. The block of flats has been built right up to the boundary and is so close to the wall of number 6 that it abuts it. This seems to ensure that there will eventually be damp problems for the flats adjacent to this wall and no way of dealing with the problem. In addition the guttering overhangs the adjacent property at this side and it seems inevitable that there will be significant damp problems.

The window at the side, facing number 6, is of a changed design that increases overlooking. It is not frosted in any way.

We would draw your attention, in particular, to the comments made by the neighbour at number 6, Mrs Kite, and the comments of the Council, both of which we support.

RICHARD CLIFTON

HEATHER HONOUR

  Councillors for Sutton South Ward, London Borough of Sutton.”

Care Minister Norman Lamb MP with Heather, launching Sutton South Hello!

An exercise class is reaching out to the Borough’s mums and older people by showing them the benefits of a healthy lifestyle.

Heather’s brainchild, the Sutton South Hello! Project, is collaborating with diet and exercise group LiveWell to promote its 10-week diet advice and exercise class.

The project aims to show people the advantages of a healthy lifestyle and to promote the number of mums and older people exercising.

Representatives from LiveWell have been touring the Borough and making stops at AgeUK meetings as well as teaming up with the Council’s Community Wellbeing Department to provide information to mums while they pick up their children from school.

Heather Honour has been one of those pushing the advantages of LiveWell and said: “I went to the “Weigh2lose” part of the LiveWell session and I was impressed. The dietician was very professional the lady who took the exercise class was also first class.

I’ve been so impressed by what I’ve seen that I want to get more people involved with LiveWell so they can experience the benefits it brings. The Sutton South Hello Project has backed this scheme as it does make a real impact on the lives of local people.”

For more information about LiveWell visit www.nhs.uk/LiveWell.