Ed, Richard and Trish at our outdoor surgery in Brighton Road
STOP PRESS – LONDON BOROUGH OF CULTURE
Sutton has made it to the short list to be London Borough of Culture 2023.
STOP PRESS – The area covered by the GO SUTTON bus has been extended. Sign our petition to make the service permanent rather than a one year trial. Scroll down the page to find out how.
Richard and Trish on the top of the Subsea7 building during its construction
Contact Richard at firstname.lastname@example.org and Trish at email@example.com
Richard was first elected to Sutton Council in 2010, and was re-elected in 2014 and 2018. Trish was first elected in 2014 and was re-elected in 2018. Richard’s charitable appeal, as Mayor of Sutton for 2016-17, to support Sutton Shopmobility and the Alzheimer’s Society, raised over £26 000.
Welcome to our site. This site aims to tell you the latest news about Sutton South Ward and our work as your local Councillors.
CONTINUE DOWN THE PAGE TO OUR CURRENT NEWS STORIES
OR CLICK ON THE LINKS BELOW TO GO TO OUR SPECIFIC PAGES
Sutton South Hello! Find out about this pioneering local initiative to combat loneliness in Sutton
On 15 January Trish and Richard visited Grosvenor Court in Brighton Road where there had been a serious fire in a second floor flat during the night. Extensive damage had been caused to the flat and the flat downstairs, but mercifully no-one was injured. We spoke to the fire office, the caretaker of the building and the owner of the flat, which had been empty and under renovation at the time.
Last October, Richard and Trish visited Sutton Court, one of the largest estates in our Ward, having learned of a fire in a flat at the block (see photo). We spoke to the next door neighbour, who lives in the flat opposite on the top floor of their block. She had been concerned at the fire but we were all relieved that no-one was hurt and the damage confined to a single flat.
The damage that fires can cause emphasises the need for everyone to fit smoke detectors and carbon monoxide indicators.
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is reviewing the boundaries of the local Government Wards in Sutton prior to the next local elections in 2022.
They have published some draft proposals. You can view these on their website and write to them with comments, to firstname.lastname@example.org
Currently the Ward runs from Sutton station in the north to Devonshire Road in the south, Banstead Road South in the east, Overton Road in the west. It is mostly a Ward of residential roads with three schools, one small park, three places of worship, split into three parts by Langley Park Road and Brighton Road running north-south.
The proposals will remove from the Ward roads east of Upland Road – Kaymoor, Willis, Prior, Downside, Farm Close – and put them into Carshalton Beeches Ward. There will be minor adjustments at the western end so the whole Ward moves westwards.
In drawing up new boundaries, the Commission is required to aim to deliver electoral equality for voters in Council elections so that each Councillor represents roughly the same number of voters. The review also aims to ensure that the new Council wards reflect, as far as possible, the interests and identities of communities across Sutton.
After a debate on 14 October Sutton Council submitted some proposals. Richard spoke in this debate, commenting in particular on the proposals fro Sutton South Ward. He said:
“I recognise that there is always a tension between drawing lines on maps that create sensible geographical structures in terms of communities and natural boundaries and getting the numbers right in terms of residents per Councillor. I would like to stress that where these create tensions I think it important to give priority to getting the boundaries right, creating areas that residents recognise as communities, in particular respecting natural boundaries such as main roads and railway lines, and keeping recognised communities together, and this should be the priority even if it does lead to some unevenness in Ward sizes. In any exercise like this there will inevitably be some disparity in the size of Wards with some outliers.”
Almost one in eight of our residents in Sutton South Ward are European Union citizens – an unusually high proportion. Hard working EU citizens have been vital to our economy, particularly in the health service, social care, transport and catering. We value the huge contribution they make to our economy and to local life. Now that Brexit will happen, we urge our residents who are EU citizens to take action to ensure they and their family can stay in the UK by applying to the Government’s settled or pre-settled status scheme, details of which are on the website www.gov.uk. If you are a citizen of the European Union, the European Economic Area or Switzerland you can apply now. You can also apply through the Council at no cost by going to www.sutton.gov.uk and typing “nationality” in the search line.
We meet many hard-working EU citizens who have lived here for years and contribute massively to our society and our economy. The UK needs what they contribute to our society.
Sutton Council is undertaking a review of the licence of the Noor Jahan Tandoori bar, at 10 Station Parade, Sutton, just south of Sutton station on the Brighton Road. Local residents can submit representations to the licensing authorities up to 20 January 2020.
Representations can be submitted to
24 Denmark Road
or by email to email@example.com
The bar has a current Premises Licence to sell food and drink till late at night.
Comments need to relate to the licensing objectives of:
Sutton Council has again, this year, offered residents and businesses in Sutton the opportunity to collect 10kg of free grit per household or business to use on footpaths, pavements or roads in front of their homes or business premises. Residents could also collect grit for elderly friends and neighbours, or residents and businesses who do not have cars.
LET US KNOW IF THERE IS A GRIT BIN IN YOUR ROAD THAT NEEDS TOPPING UP.
STOP PRESS – The article below was published in November just before the final consultation on parking commenced. It summarises the position reached following earlier rounds of consultation. The consultation is now closed and the results are being analysed.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED SO FAR
The Council decided that, as parking is often raised as a problem in the regular surveys of residents on what they like about living in Sutton, it would ask all Sutton residents if parking was a problem in their road and what they would like done. Earlier rounds of consultation in our Ward led to proposals that were not given sufficient support by residents for the Council to proceed with them.
Responses to consultation
highlighted two problems. First, unless the controls cover the whole local area
parking will be displaced into roads without controls. Second, “free to park at
any time” bays would be a magnet for commuters and long stay parkers, squeezing
out residents. The only alternative to schemes that have these disadvantages is
a residents-only Permit Parking Area.
WHAT IS NOW PROPOSED
Consequently, the Council is
now consulting on a proposed Permit Parking Area. As roads not within the
scheme will suffer from displaced parking if the roads nearby are in the scheme,
the area consulted on is wide and runs from Egmont Road to Willis Avenue and
Prior Avenue – including Chalgrove Road, The Ridgway, Mayfield Road, Farm Road,
Farm Close, Upland Road, Kayemoor Road, Downside Road, Willis Avenue and Prior
Individual roads in this area
could be left out of the scheme if there is strong resident opposition in their
road, but they might then find they suffer significant parking pressure if
adjacent roads are all in the scheme. This would be a problematic outcome for
those roads so one we hope to avoid.
The way the Parking Permit
Area works is that only residents can park their vehicles in the road for a “control
period”, 9 to 11 AM each day on weekdays, thus removing commuters and long stay
parkers. Residents who need to park a car on the road rather than in their
drive during the “control period” can obtain a parking permit to display on any
vehicle they want to park in the road during the “control period”, and obtain
“visitors’ permits” for their visitors. As this scheme will involve some costs
of administration and enforcement there would be a charge for a permit, to
cover costs. The Council can only cover costs, not use parking charges to
subsidise other services. Parking charges in Sutton are amongst the lowest of
borough. Charges per vehicle for permits in the CPZ area are on a scale you can
find on the Council website and start at £40. A similar charge in Croydon is
£80, Merton and Kingston £90, Richmond £99. You only need a permit if you
need to park a car in the road during the “control period.” A Permit Parking
Area involves notices to advise of parking controls but there is no need for
The Council is consulting residents on this proposal. Consultation closes on 21 November.
Parking Strategy, Highways
and Transport, London Borough of Sutton, 24 Denmark Road,
Carshalton, Surrey, SM52JG.
Even if you are indifferent
to the outcome, it would be helpful to know that, so please respond. If you
support the proposal, say so. If you are opposed to this proposal make sure you
explain your reasons, related to parking, for not favouring the scheme.
We are not making any
recommendation – as local Councillors we simply want to do what our residents
want. But you should be aware that the Council’s consultation is comprehensive
and it is possible that almost all the roads in the area from Sutton station to
Carshalton Beeches station will eventually have parking controls, so those
roads left out will inevitably attract commuter parking.
Many residents are concerned
about parking and we are pleased they now have the opportunity to put their
view on a concrete proposal developed on the basis of earlier consultation.
We hope residents will respond to the consultation so we have a full picture.
Sutton Council has put in a bid to a fund financed by the Mayor of London called “Liveable Neighbourhoods”. It will be in competition with lots of other bids from other boroughs and Sutton has a poor record of getting funds from the Mayor. So it is a bit of a gleam in the eye. If Sutton is successful we will know by about next March.
The scheme would fund action on a range of measures that would improve the environment locally. If successful we could get funds to invest in our neighbourhood. This money could be spent on issues like safer crossings, reducing cut-through traffic, better roads so children can walk to school safely, more electric charging points and better cycling infrastructure. This would include measures to encourage walking and cycling, and to improve air quality. There is a website with details and a survey you can complete.
There is also information on the fund on the TfL website. This says:
“Our Liveable Neighbourhoods programme gives boroughs the opportunity to bid for funding for long-term schemes that encourage walking, cycling and the use of public transport.
programme supports the aims of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy by
funding local schemes to reduce car trips and improve neighbourhoods for
walking, cycling and public transport.
Grants will be provided for a wide range of community-supported projects. These could include creating green spaces and cycling infrastructure and redesigning junctions. The programme can also fund the widening of walking routes to improve access to local shops, businesses and public transport.”
Trish and Richard visited Waltham Forest where they had funding under this scheme, in the time Boris Johnson was Mayor, for a scheme known there as “Mini-Holland” as one of the objectives, but not the only one, is to promote cycling.
One of the ideas, just to give an example, is “cycle hangers” which provide secure outside storage for bikes – very popular in areas where there are blocks of flats and people have little room for bikes in their flat. This is particularly so if they do not live on the ground floor so have to lug a bike upstairs. A majority of residents in our Ward (Sutton South) live in flats, a majority of these people living in upstairs flats, so we think there would be great demand for these spaces. The hangers take up one parking space in the road. See photo above.
Closing roads outside schools for half an hour when the pupils are going in and out is an idea, but this is now a common practice in some parts of London, for example at the school Richard’s grandson goes to in Herne Hill, where there is a rota of parents who erect temporary gates.
Road closures (turning some residential roads into cul-de-sacs by closing them at one end) to reduce rat-running down otherwise quiet residential streets and move the traffic onto main roads is certainly an aspect, but it needs approaching with care. The objective would be to move traffic onto main roads so that residential streets are quieter, with no through traffic, safer for pedestrians and cyclists, and with improved air quality.
There are undoubted pros and cons that need careful examination. There is a good example locally, in Belmont, the gate in Dorset Road close to the junction with Holland Avenue. This is inconvenient to motorists and many residents, and adds to traffic in roads like Holland Avenue. But it massively adds to the quality of life, quiet and clean air of residents of the Homeland Drive area, who otherwise would experience a lot of rat running traffic. It is surely worth investigating whether there is scope for similar interventions locally. Examples in our Ward could be Chalgrove Road and Cumnor Road, where the removal of through traffic would have a transformational effect on the quiet of the road and air quality.
We were told that the experience in Waltham Forest was that they put in some “modal filters” as they call these closures in some roads for a six month trial. In most but not all cases the residents wanted to keep the controls in place at the end of six months, and in some cases where the residents wanted them removed the residents now want them back. Some residents find them inconvenient as they make their own journeys by car more complicated, but it seems most feel this downside is outweighed by having quiet streets with reduced traffic and less air pollution. There is also the fact that if there are comprehensive parking controls introduced in an area, reducing parking, there will be speeding and probably increased through traffic.
Residents have asked us about the circulation of a list of possible road closures. The origin of this list is some illustrative examples prepared by consultants working on the bid to demonstrate what might be done. In fact the Dorset Road example is a much better example as it is real and already exists.
So we think it worthwhile bidding for this money. The Council has made no announcement about it as we do not know yet if the funding will be forthcoming.
The Go Sutton bus trial is attracting a lot of attention. Information is at www.gosutton.co.uk.
The year-long trial for this on-demand bus service has had positive feedback and is being extended to cover the area shown on the map. Register online and phone when you want to use the bus. It is £3.50 (plus additional passengers at £2) but free if you have a Freedom Pass, like Richard.
The bus service an innovative, on-demand scheme which picks up residents close to where they live and takes them to any destination across most parts of the borough. The scheme started earlier this year and is due to end in May 2020 but Liberal Democrats in Sutton are keen for the service to become permanent. Residents have told us, especially elderly people or those with learning difficulties, that the bus scheme has proved to be a lifeline for them. That’s why Liberal Democrat councillors have set up a petition calling on the Mayor of London and Transport for London to make the scheme permanent.You can sign the petition by clicking here – please do pass it on to your neighbours, family and friends in Sutton. Apart from helping people to get around the borough, the scheme is helping us to improve air quality, reduce congestion and cut down on the number of individual car journeys.Please sign the petition and help us to keep making Sutton a great to place live.
Trish and Richard intervened in the debate over an application for a licence to sell alcohol, from the Registrar’s Office in Worcester Road, The Russettings. They persuaded the office to limit the hours sought so that it did not extend into the evenings.
The office was happy to do this as they are closed in the evening. It seems the application for a licence in the evening was a mistake. They want to be able to provide the happy couple at the weddings they conduct with a glass of champagne. These weddings are always daytime events.
Richard spoke at the hearing on the licence application. This is his speech:
“The task of the committee is to satisfy itself that two very important objectives can be achieved simultaneously. There is no reason why they cannot be.
First, the Registrar’s Office should be able to properly
perform the important functions it discharges for the residents of Sutton, in a
world where (I accept) the expectations of the community as to how these
functions are discharged has changed a little.
Second, the Office should be a good neighbour and not
disturb the peace and quiet of the residential area where it is situated.
I would like to say a word about each of these objectives.
The Registrar’s Office has been in Worcester Road for over 50 years and its
functions have changed little over time. I have been to weddings at the office,
as a guest, to meetings and conferences there, and to Citizenship Ceremonies.
During my year as Mayor I attended these every week to make a speech of welcome
to new citizens. The importance of these functions to those who take part needs
to be recognised. The day you get married, the day you take British
citizenship, these are massive moments in life that stay in the memory and I
know the office does all it can to ensure these are happy events. I have been
to these events and found champagne is being served when it has been brought by
the happy couple or, very occasionally, the new citizen. I think it quite
appropriate that a glass of champagne should be available at these events.
Those involved all want to make this a happy day and there is no reason atall
to suppose that this will lead to disorder in the context of these carefully
organised and conducted ceremonies. In fact, there is more of an element of
control if champagne is being provided in a managed way rather than people
bringing their own.
On the second objective, the expectations of the Councillors and the residents is that the Office will continue to be a good neighbour. That is vital and I am pleased the Office has emphasised its commitment to do this. I am pleased with the assurances that have been given about a limit on the supply of champagne and how these events will continue to be carefully organised. The changes the Office have made to the application to limit the hours and to daytime are, of course, of massive importance and re-assurance.
There was no reason why the licence should extend into the
evening. These weddings are daytime events and the office is normally closed in
I think it important this hearing today had taken place so we can get these assurances from the Office. The officers who run the Registrar’s Office know that were there to be any disorder and disturbance to local residents in the future, the Councillors and their employers would be immediately investigating. I very much hope the Office will continue to discharge these very important functions – which bring happiness to those who take part are are important, memorable days in their lives – without any undue disturbance to the neighbourhood beyond what has happened for the many years the Office has been in Worcester Road. “